Legal Opinion

Drosdowski v. Supreme Council of Order of Chosen Friends

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided September 14, 1897PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Error to Wayne; Hosmer, J. Assumpsit by Marie Drosdowski against the Supreme Council of the Order of Chosen Friends upon a benefit certificate. From a judgment for plaintiff on verdict directed by the court, defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtMoore, J.

Carl Drosdowski became a beneficiary member of defendant order in 1885. He died in 1889. His daughter, the beneficiary named in the certificate of membership, recovered a verdict for .$1,362. The jury returned this verdict by direction of the court. Defendant appeals.

The constitution and by-laws of the order were received in evidence. These show that a person upwards of 61 years of age cannot become a beneficiary member of the order, though he may become a social member of the order. The certificate of membership was received in evidence, and an attempt was made to introduce the application,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hunt v. Supreme CouncilMichigan Supreme Court · 1887
  2. Tessmann v. Supreme Commandery of United FriendsMichigan Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Harris's Appeal from CommissionersSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1890
  4. Sing Cheong Co. v. Yung WingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1890
  5. Harris v. BrownSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1873

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Derinza's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1918
  2. Carpenter v. Alberto-Culver Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1970
  3. McCall Co. v. JacobsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1905
  4. Baldwin v. SalgadoCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1911
  5. Wanner v. Wayne Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1912

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API