Legal Opinion

Harris's Appeal from Commissioners

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided March 3, 1890PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from the doings of commissioners on the insolvent estate of the Union Cattle Company of Hartford, in allowing a claim presented by F. P. Halsey; taken to the Superior Court in Hartford County, and heard before Phelps, J. Facts found and'judgment rendered for the appellant and appeal by the original appellee. The case is sufficiently stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtTorrance, J.

On this appeal two questions were argued before this court.

The first was, whether the court below erred in deciding upon the facts found that the present appellant, Halsey, had no claim against the insolvent estate of the Union Cattle Company of Hartford, Connecticut; and the second was, whether the court erred in receiving in evidence the deposition of William R. Haskell against the objection of Halsey, the present appellant.

Upon the first question, it does not appear from the record with sufficient clearness that any question of law was distinctly raised at the trial below and was decided…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. Cousin v. TaylorOregon Supreme Court · 1925
  2. Cahn v. CahnSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
  3. Lake Erie & Western Railroad v. HuffmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1912
  4. Drosdowski v. Supreme Council of Order of Chosen FriendsMichigan Supreme Court · 1897
  5. McCall Co. v. JacobsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1905

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API