Legal Opinion

Haugens v. Foster

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided August 19, 1943No. Gen. No. 9,863PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Dove

This case involves the validity of a promissory note which included in the principal thereof the sum of $500 which was part of a prior note for $5000, and for which appellee accepted $4500 when the makers procured a new loan from the Federal Land Bank of St. Louis. The cause is here by appeal from a judgment of the circuit court of Marshall county in favor of appellee for the amount of the note, except the $500 mentioned. Appellee has assigned a cross-error 'on the failure to include the $500 in the judgment.

The record discloses that on April 25, 1934, Thomas B. Foster and Mary E. Foster, his…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. McAllister v. DrapeauCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
  2. Meek v. WilsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Black v. Wabash, St. Louis & Pacific Railway Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1884
  4. Federal Land Bank of Omaha v. HouckSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1942
  5. Federal Land Bank of Columbia v. GainesSupreme Court of the United States · 1933

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Moone v. Commercial Casualty InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1953
  2. Spindler v. KriegerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1975
  3. Pet Milk Co. v. BolandCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1949
  4. Jost v. CorneliusAppellate Court of Illinois · 1948
  5. Morris v. Pennsylvania RailroadAppellate Court of Illinois · 1956

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API