Legal Opinion

Fregara v. Jet Aviation Business Jets

District Court, D. New Jersey

Decided May 28, 1991No. Civ. A. 89-3788PublishedCited by 49 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

POLITAN, District Judge.

This matter comes before the court on defendants’ motion for the entry of summary judgment dismissing all seven counts of plaintiff’s complaint. I heard oral argument on February 25, 1991 and reserved decision. For the reasons outlined herein, defendants’ motion is GRANTED.

Plaintiff, Ronald Fregara (“Fregara”), instituted this action by filing a seven count complaint on September 8, 1989. Fregara alleges in the first through fourth counts that Jet Aviation Business Jets, Inc. (“Jet”) and its agents Richard Kunert and Edward Baillif (“plaintiff’s former…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
  5. Cruz LOPEZ, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. S.B. THOMAS, INC., Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by49 opinions

  1. Orr v. Westminster Village North, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Witkowski v. Thomas J. Lipton, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1994
  3. Nicosia v. Wakefern Food Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1994
  4. Marrero v. Camden County Board of Social ServicesDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2001
  5. Philip Varrallo v. Hammond Incorporated William AbelCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1996

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API