Finch, Van Slyck & McConville v. Le Sueur County Co-operative Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
After the former appeal, reported in 132 Minn. 9, 155 N. W. 754, Albert Sladek moved to vacate the order disallowing claims of creditors and for permission to be heard in the matter of the allowance of each claim. The motion was granted, Morrison, J., and a time fixed for hearing on all claims. From the order granting the motion, John H. Lebens, as receiver of defendant corporation, and plaintiff appealed.
1Opinion of the Court
Brown, O. J.
This proceeding was brought to enforce the statutory liability of the stockholders of the Le Sueur County Co-operative Association, an in*377solvent mercantile corporation. The matter was before us on a former appeal ivhen various questions were disposed of, including an order assessing the stock 100 per ’cent of its par value. 132 Minn. 9, 155 N. W. 754. During the pendency of the former appeal the court below made an order allowing a large number of claims against the corporation, which order was merged in a judgment of November 3, 1915. The opinion on the former appeal was filed on…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Bates v. RybergCalifornia Supreme Court · 1871
- Knabe v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1908
- Finch, Van Slyck & McConville v. VanasekSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
- Bosworth v. Terminal R. Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1897
- Oswald v. Minneapolis Times Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1896
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Pulver v. Commercial Security Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1917
- Anderson v. KruegerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1927
- Peterson v. DareliusSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
- Greenfield v. Minnesota Mining & Development Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1917
- Cox-Rushing Greer Co. v. RichardsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1925
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.