Greenfield v. Minnesota Mining & Development Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Action in the district court for St. Louis county to sequestrate the property of defendant corporation and enforce the liability of stockholders. From an order, Dancer, J., sustaining plaintiff’s demurrer to the amended answer, Christ Sanders appealed.
1Opinion of the Court
Dibell, C.
This is an action to enforce the stock liability of the stockholders of the defendant corporation. The defendant Sanders answered. The plaintiff demurred to a portion of the answer. From the order sustaining the demurrer the defendant Sanders appeals.
1. The action is brought under G. S. 1913, § 6634, et seq., and rests upon a judgment for the plaintiff against the defendant corporation upon which an execution was returned unsatisfied. The answer is in*447tended to charge as an affirmative defense that the judgment was procured by fraud and collusion between the plaintiff and the…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Ward v. JoslinSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
- Schrader v. Manufacturers' Nat. Bank of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Hanson v. DavisonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1898
- Holland v. Duluth Iron Mining & Development Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1896
- Nichols v. StevensSupreme Court of Missouri · 1894
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Phelps v. Consolidated Vermillion & Extension Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1923
- Rogers v. DrewrySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1935
- Payne v. SparksSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1929