Legal Opinion
Peterson v. Darelius
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided August 6, 1926No. 25,208PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Lees, O.
The Mortgage Security Company of Minnesota is an insolvent corporation, now in the hands of a receiver. The respondents are stockholders, or the representatives of stockholders, seeking to compel the receiver to refund moneys they had paid to him. Their application for an order directing him to refund was granted, and the receiver and the corporation appealed.
In June, 1921, the district court levied an assessment of 100 per cent upon the stockholders. The basis of the assessment was their alleged constitutional liability to creditors. In August, 1921, the stockholders applied to the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State v. Mortgage Security Co. of Minnesota, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1923
- Dickerman v. LordSupreme Court of Iowa · 1866
- Carpenter v. SouthworthCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1908
- Finch, Van Slyck & McConville v. Le Sueur County Co-operative Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
- State Bank of Commerce v. Kenney Band Instrument Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1919
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Dobler v. BawdenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1947
- Drexler v. WaltersDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1968
- Exchange National Bank of Chicago v. AbramsonDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1969
- Wallace T. Bruce, Inc. v. NajarianSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1957
- Peterka v. DennisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2009