Legal Opinion
Anderson v. Krueger
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided February 11, 1927No. 25,774PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Taylor, C.
The defendants operated a public local grain warehouse at West-brook in Cottonwood county under the firm name -of Krueger Grain Company. The intervener, Indemnity Insurance Company of North America, is the surety upon their bond given pursuant to the statute for the protection of those storing grain in the warehouse. In April, 1925, Charles A. Flinn was appointed receiver of the grain company by the district court. Many claims were filed for grain for which the claimants held “storage tickets” issued in the form prescribed by G. S. 1923, § 5068. Some claims were filed for which the…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Northern Trust Co. v. Consolidated Elevator Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1919
- Cooper, Myers & Co. v. SmithSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1918
- Oswald v. St. Paul Globe Publishing Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1895
- Frost v. St. Paul Banking & Investment Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1894
- Adams v. City of Thief River FallsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1901
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Peterson v. BentleySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1947
- Eldridge v. Payette-Boise Water Users' Ass'nIdaho Supreme Court · 1929
- Luethi v. StankoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1953
- State v. SaxSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
- State v. SaxSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1950