Jayo v. Industrial Com'n of Arizona
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
NOYES, Judge.
This is a special action review of an Arizona Industrial Commission Award denying compensability. See Ariz.Rev.Stat.Ann. (“A.R.S.”) § 23-951(A) (1983); R.P. Special Actions 10(f) (Supp.1994). The issue is whether the Petitioner (“Claimant”) was in the course of employment when he was injured while playing hacky sac during a scheduled lockout at a remote jobsite. Applying an independent-judgment standard of review to the totality of circumstances, we hold that Claimant was in the course of employment when injured.
I. FACTS
Claimant was the general foreman of a crew of…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- O'Leary v. Brown-Pacific-Maxon, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Circle K Store 1131 v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1990
- Nemeth v. Michigan Building ComponentsMichigan Supreme Court · 1973
- Truck Insurance Exchange v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1974
- Finnegan v. Industrial Com'n of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court · 1988
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Dugan v. American Express Travel Related Services Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1995
- Noble v. Industrial Com'n of ArizonaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1996
- Naglieri v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2014
- Williams v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1998
- Martinez v. ShcCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2017