Legal Opinion

Jayo v. Industrial Com'n of Arizona

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided February 2, 1995No. 1 CA-IC 93-0139PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

NOYES, Judge.

This is a special action review of an Arizona Industrial Commission Award denying compensability. See Ariz.Rev.Stat.Ann. (“A.R.S.”) § 23-951(A) (1983); R.P. Special Actions 10(f) (Supp.1994). The issue is whether the Petitioner (“Claimant”) was in the course of employment when he was injured while playing hacky sac during a scheduled lockout at a remote jobsite. Applying an independent-judgment standard of review to the totality of circumstances, we hold that Claimant was in the course of employment when injured.

I. FACTS

Claimant was the general foreman of a crew of…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. O'Leary v. Brown-Pacific-Maxon, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
  2. Circle K Store 1131 v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Nemeth v. Michigan Building ComponentsMichigan Supreme Court · 1973
  4. Truck Insurance Exchange v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1974
  5. Finnegan v. Industrial Com'n of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court · 1988

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Dugan v. American Express Travel Related Services Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1995
  2. Noble v. Industrial Com'n of ArizonaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1996
  3. Naglieri v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2014
  4. Williams v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1998
  5. Martinez v. ShcCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API