Legal Opinion
United States v. Clinton Strache
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided January 27, 2000No. 99-2516PublishedCited by 64 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KANNE, Circuit Judge.
Clinton Strache appeals two district court decisions: denial of his motion to suppress evidence seized in a search to which Strache claims that he did not consent, and a two-level enhancement under U.S.S.G. § 2K2.1(b)(l)(B) of his sentence for possession of unregistered firearms. We find that the district court did not commit clear error in finding that Strache consented to the search or in finding that Strache possessed seven “destructive devices” within the meaning of U.S.S.G. § 2K2.1(b)(l)(B) to justify enhancement of his sentence. We affirm both district court…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- United States v. MatlockSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- United States v. Lenin M. Jerez and Carlos M. SolisCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997
- United States v. Spencer Ray TilmonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
- United States v. Matthew LagroneCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by64 opinions
- United States v. Joseph N. BasinskiCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
- United States v. Salvador A. VivitCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
- United States v. Robert BaileyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
- United States v. Ronald T. SchaeferCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2002
- United States v. Cruz-MendezCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.