Dreilling v. First National Bank
Supreme Court of Kansas
Error from Ellis Bistriet Court. Action to recover on a promissory note. Trial at the September term, 1887, and verdict for the plaintiff, Bank, for $363.17. New trial denied, and judgment given for plaintiff. The defendants bring the case here.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Holt, C.:
This was an action in the Ellis district court on a negotiable promissory note; trial by jury; the court directed them peremptorily to find for the plaintiff for the unpaid balance of the note. The defendants, as plaintiffs in error, complain of this direction of the court, and of certain rulings concerning the pleadings.
The action was commenced by the Eirst National Bank of Battle Creek, as plaintiff. Afterward the court permitted a supplemental petition to be filed wherein none of the allegations of the original petition were repeated upon which the plaintiff relied to…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Fox v. Bank of Kansas CitySupreme Court of Kansas · 1883
- Clark v. SpencerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1875
- Brookover v. EsterlySupreme Court of Kansas · 1873
3Cited by19 opinions
- Elmore County Bank v. AvantSupreme Court of Alabama · 1914
- German-American National Bank v. LewisAlabama Court of Appeals · 1913
- Union National Bank v. WinsorSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1907
- A. Morrison & Co. v. Farmers & Merchants BankSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1900
- Wynnewood Cotton Oil Co. v. MooreSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.