Legal Opinion

A. Morrison & Co. v. Farmers & Merchants Bank

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 8, 1900PublishedCited by 20 opinions

Error from the District Court of Olclahoma County; before B. F. Burwell, District Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the court by

Burfoiid, O. J.:

The plaintiff in error, A. Morrison, was a wholesale fruit dealer in Oklahoma City,'doing business as A. Morrison & Oo. Porter Brothers cornpai^ were fruit jobbers in Chicago, Illinois, and Los Angeles, California. The defendant in error, the Farmers and Merchants Bank of Los Angeles, was a banking corporation, organized under the laws of the state of California, and doing business at Los Angeles. In December, 1897, Morrison ordered a carload of oranges and lemons from Porter Brothers- company, to be shipped from California to Arkansas City, Ka'nisas.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Brush v. WareSupreme Court of the United States · 1841
  2. Heuertematte v. . MorrisNew York Court of Appeals · 1885
  3. Goetz v. Bank of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  4. First National Bank of Detroit v. BurkhamMichigan Supreme Court · 1875
  5. Manufacturers' National Bank of Racine v. NewellWisconsin Supreme Court · 1888

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Acme Hay & Mill Feed Co. v. Metropolitan National BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1924
  2. Citizens' Savings Bank of Columbus v. LandisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  3. Merchants National Bank of St. Paul v. Santa Maria Sugar Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1914
  4. First National Bank v. McNairySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1913
  5. National Bank of Commerce v. ArmbrusterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API