Legal Opinion
In re Davon M.
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided October 25, 1988No. 6347PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtNorcott, J.
The principal issue raised in this appeal is whether the trial court erred in terminating the parental rights of the respondent for failure to rehabilitate himself within the meaning of General Statutes § 17-43a. Specifically, the respondent claims that the trial court relied on definitions of “rehabilitation” and “personal rehabilitation” that do not reflect the changes in § 17-43a effected by Public Acts 1983, No. 83-478.1 We do not agree.
*695Our review of this case discloses that the trial court properly considered the statutory criteria of personal rehabilitation within the meaning of General…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- In re Migdalia M.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1986
- In Re Juvenile Appeal (84-3)Connecticut Appellate Court · 1983
- State v. DuhanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
- Peterson v. Town of OxfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- Rene Dry Wall Co. v. Strawberry Hill AssociatesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Williams Ford, Inc. v. Hartford Courant Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- In re Kezia M.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1993
- In re Roshawn R.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1998
- In re Christina V.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1995
- In re Eden F.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1998
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.