Legal Opinion
Malozienc v. Pacific Rail Services
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided August 19, 2008No. 05 C 7001PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
MORTON DENLOW, United States Magistrate Judge.
Plaintiff John Malozienc (“Plaintiff’) filed a racial discrimination suit under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and 42 U.S.C. § 1981 against his employer, Defendant Pacific Rail Services (“Defendant”). Defendant filed a motion for summary judgment contending Plaintiffs claim is untimely. The Court conducted oral argument on August 12, 2008 and announced the ruling from the bench. This opinion goes into greater detail regarding the basis for the Court’s decision. For the following reasons, Defendant’s motion…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Federal Express Corp. v. HoloweckiSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Donald C. Hedberg v. Indiana Bell Telephone Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
- Paper Express, Limited, an Illinois Corporation v. Pfankuch Maschinen Gmbh, a German CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Malozienc v. Pacific Rail ServicesDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2009
- Cleveland v. The BehemothDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2021