Haislop v. Edgell
West Virginia Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
McGRAW, Justice.
Appellants challenge the state’s active, public disclosure of personal information and the lifetime registration requirements applied to them under the West Virginia Sex Offender Registration Act, W. Va.Code § 15-12-1 et seq. They seek reversal of the lower court’s order denying their request for in-junctive relief. For the reasons stated, we affirm the order of the lower court.
I
FACTS
Our analysis in this ease is guided by the words of the U.S. Supreme Court in a recent decision. “Sex offenders are a serious threat in this Nation. The victims of sex assault are most often…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Smith v. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Connecticut Department of Public Safety v. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Waite v. Civil Service CommissionWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1978
- Stuart v. Lake Washington Realty Corp.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1956
- Mainella v. Board of Trustees of Policemen's Pension or Relief FundWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1943
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- People v. CorneliusIllinois Supreme Court · 2004
- Slansky v. Nebraska State PatrolNebraska Supreme Court · 2004
- State of West Virginia v. Jerry DeelWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2016
- Richmond v. LevinWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2006
- State of West Virginia v. Patrick Shawn CollinsWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2016
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.