Legal Opinion
Borger Management, Inc. v. Sindram
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided October 14, 2005No. 03-CV-14PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BELSON, Senior Judge:
Borger Management, Inc. (Borger), appeals a trial court decision and order of November 22, 2002, denying its motion for partial summary judgment and granting the cross-motion for summary .judgment of appellee, Michael Sindram. Borger contends that the trial judge erred in that she held that the District of Columbia Rental Housing Act (RHA), D.C.Code § 42-3501.01-3509.07 (2001), created an “endless lease,” terminable only for statutory good cause, and that the federal Section 8 voucher statute, 42 U.S.C. § 1437f(a), which allows landlords to opt out of the Section 8…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Montana v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- United States v. Utah Construction & Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Langnes v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- California Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. GuerraSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Blodgett v. University ClubDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2007
- Calomiris v. CalomirisDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2010
- Franco v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2010
- Gomez v. Independence Management of Delaware, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2009
- Elwell v. ElwellDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2008
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.