Legal Opinion

Pittsburg Steel Co. v. Baltimore Equitable Society

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided March 31, 1910PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Appeal from the Superior Court of Baltimore City (Stock-bridge, J.)-. The cause was argued before Botd, O. J., Briscoe, Pearce, Schmuckee, Burke, Thomas, Pattisoh and Urher, JJ.

1Opinion of the CourtSchmucker, J.

This appeal raises.’the issue of the constitutionality of Chapter 305 of the Acts of 1908, which abated pending actions at law to enforce a stockholder’s liability to the creditors of a corporation and substituted therefor a creditor’s bill in equity.

The present suit was instituted in the Superior Court of Baltimore City on February 21st, 1908, by the appellant as a creditor against the appellee as a stockholder of the South Baltimore Steel Car and Foundry Company. The declaration contains six common counts in assumpsit, and one special count alleging that the plaintiff is a creditor of the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Seibert v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  2. Lampasas v. BellSupreme Court of the United States · 1901
  3. Hager v. ClevelandCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1872
  4. Matthews v. AlbertCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1866
  5. Brant v. EhlenCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1882

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Atkinson v. SappersteinCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1948
  2. Burke v. Fidelity Trust CompanyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1953
  3. Pittsburg Steel Co. v. Baltimore Equitable SocietySupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  4. Hughes v. HallCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1912
  5. Nagel v. GhingherCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1934

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API