Legal Opinion

Atkinson v. Sapperstein

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided July 20, 1948No. [No. 38, October Term, 1948 (Adv.)]PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCollins, J.

The appellee, Earl Sapperstein, filed an amended bill of complaint in Circuit Court No. 2 of Baltimore City against Hamilton R. Atkinson, Commissioner of Police of Baltimore City, appellant, in which he alleged that his occupation was that of buying ice cream to sell or offer to sell from a motor vehicle in Baltimore City and in Kent County. He alleged that the provisions of Sections 24 and 25 of Article 56, 1939 Code, (Licenses), sub-head, “Hawkers and Peddlers”, are unconstitutional and void. He also made the following allegations.

Hamilton R. Atkinson, appellant, is charged with the duties…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Staley v. Safe Deposit & Trust Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1947
  2. Levin v. HewesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1912
  3. Luman v. Hitchens Bros. Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1899
  4. Stiefel v. Maryland Institution for the Instruction of the BlindCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1884
  5. Ryan v. HerbertCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1946

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Salisbury Beauty Schools v. State Board of CosmetologistsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1973
  2. Heath v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
  3. Nottingham Village, Inc. v. Baltimore CountyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1972
  4. Gordon v. FollowellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1964
  5. McBriety v. CITY COUNCIL OF BALTIMORECourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1959

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API