Legal Opinion

Matthews v. Albert

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided May 1, 1866PublishedCited by 35 opinions

Appeal from the Superior Court of Baltimore City. The facts of this case are stated in the opinion of this Court.

1Opinion of the CourtGoldsborough, J.

On the 1st of September, 1858, the “ Coal Oil and Par-affine Company of Baltimore,” became incorporated in accordance with the provisions of the Act of 1852, ch. 338. Soon after the organization of the company, it incurred sundry liabilities, and amongst them, the claims alleged to be due to the complainants named in the bill of complaint in this case. Judgments were obtained by the complainants against the company' on their claims. Executions were issued thereon, and were returned nulla bona. Being, as they allege, without remedy, except in a Court of Equity, and having discovered that the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Garrison v. . HoweNew York Court of Appeals · 1858

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Burgess v. SeligmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  2. Zang v. WyantSupreme Court of Colorado · 1898
  3. Norris v. WrenschallCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1871
  4. Colton v. MayerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1900
  5. Hospelhorn v. PoeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1938

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API