Legal Opinion
In Re Humar
United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Ohio
Decided December 22, 1993No. 19-40133PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OF OPINION AND ORDER
RANDOLPH BANTER, Bankruptcy Judge.
This matter came before the Court on the Defendants’ Motion to Reopen their Chapter 7 case for the purpose of adding a creditor omitted from the original schedules filed in their case. According to the Debtors’ counsel, the debt is a contingent debt that arose prepetition. The case is a no asset case. The creditor to whom the debt is owed is the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, the mortgage insurer of the Debtors’ real property.
Under the authority of 11 U.S.C. § 350 and Bankruptcy Rule 5010, debtors regularly…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- In Re Aida Lucilla Rosinski D/B/A New Caravan Garden Bar, Debtor. Aida Rosinski D/B/A New Caravan Garden Bar v. Willard BoydCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1985
- In Re Gilbert G. BEEZLEY, Debtor. Gilbert G. BEEZLEY, Appellant, v. CALIFORNIA LAND TITLE COMPANY, AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
- In Re MendiolaUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 1989
- In Re AndersonUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Minnesota · 1987
- In Re ThibodeauUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts · 1992
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- In Re CruzUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2000
- Karras v. Hansen (In Re Karras)District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1994
- In Re PattersonUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Tennessee · 2003
- In Re GardnerUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. South Carolina · 1996
- McMahon v. Harmon (In Re Harmon)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Maryland · 1997
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.