Legal Opinion
In Re Gilbert G. BEEZLEY, Debtor. Gilbert G. BEEZLEY, Appellant, v. CALIFORNIA LAND TITLE COMPANY, Appellee
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided June 4, 1993No. 91-55809,PublishedCited by 146 opinions
1Per curiam
Debtor Gilbert G. Beezley appeals the decision of the Ninth Circuit BAP, affirming the bankruptcy court’s denial of his motion to reopen his bankruptcy case under 11 U.S.C. § 350(b). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 158(d), and we affirm.
Beezley argues that the bankruptcy court abused its discretion by failing to grant his motion to reopen his case. See In re Herzig, 96 B.R. 264, 266 (9th Cir. BAP 1989) (bankruptcy court’s refusal to reopen a closed case under 11 U.S.C. § 350(b) reviewed for an abuse of discretion). We disagree. Based on the assumption that amendment was necessary…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- In Re MendiolaUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 1989
- In Re ThibodeauUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts · 1992
- In Re HunterDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1990
- Kozman v. Herzig (In Re Herzig)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- In Re StecklowUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Maryland · 1992
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by146 opinions
- Susan Judd v. Lawrence Wolfe, Susan Judd, DebtorCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1996
- In Re Thomas R. Beaty and Nancy Z. Beaty, Debtors, Thomas R. Beaty v. David SelingerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Fidelity National Title Insurance v. Franklin (In Re Franklin)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. California · 1995
- Lopez v. Specialty Restaurants Corp. (In Re Lopez)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Tidwell v. Smith (In Re Smith)Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009
141 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.