Sanhueza v. Liberty Steel Erectors
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
EAGLES, Judge.
Plaintiff first argues that the Industrial Commission erred in concluding that plaintiff unjustifiably refused to cooperate with defendants’ reasonable vocational efforts. Plaintiff argues that any failure to cooperate on his part was justified and that he is therefore entitled to continuing temporary total disability benefits. We disagree.
The findings of fact made by the Industrial Commission are conclusive on appeal if supported by any competent evidence. Watkins v. City of Asheville, 99 N.C. App. 302, 303, 392 S.E.2d 754, 756, disc. review denied, 327 N.C. 488, 397 S.E.2d 238…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Burwell v. Winn-Dixie Raleigh, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1994
- McLean v. Roadway Express, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
- Watkins v. City of AshevilleCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1990
3Cited by20 opinions
- Foster v. U.S. Airways, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
- Scurlock v. Durham County General HospitalCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1999
- Powe v. Centerpoint Human ServicesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2011
- Powe v. Centerpoint Human ServicesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2013
- Sykes v. MOSS TRUCKING CO., INC.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.