Legal Opinion

Sanhueza v. Liberty Steel Erectors

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided June 4, 1996No. COA95-468PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EAGLES, Judge.

Plaintiff first argues that the Industrial Commission erred in concluding that plaintiff unjustifiably refused to cooperate with defendants’ reasonable vocational efforts. Plaintiff argues that any failure to cooperate on his part was justified and that he is therefore entitled to continuing temporary total disability benefits. We disagree.

The findings of fact made by the Industrial Commission are conclusive on appeal if supported by any competent evidence. Watkins v. City of Asheville, 99 N.C. App. 302, 303, 392 S.E.2d 754, 756, disc. review denied, 327 N.C. 488, 397 S.E.2d 238…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Burwell v. Winn-Dixie Raleigh, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1994
  2. McLean v. Roadway Express, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
  3. Watkins v. City of AshevilleCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1990

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Foster v. U.S. Airways, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
  2. Scurlock v. Durham County General HospitalCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1999
  3. Powe v. Centerpoint Human ServicesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2011
  4. Powe v. Centerpoint Human ServicesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2013
  5. Sykes v. MOSS TRUCKING CO., INC.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API