Legal Opinion

Watkins v. City of Asheville

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided July 3, 1990No. 8910IC1186PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORR, Judge.

Plaintiff first argues that the Full Commission erred in finding as fact “[t]hat the surgery recommended by plaintiff’s physician has a high probability of significantly reducing the period of plaintiff’s disability and would be sought by a similarly situated reasonable man.” For the reasons set forth below, we find no error. .

In reviewing an opinion and award of the Industrial Commission, this Court is limited in its inquiry to two questions of law: “(1) whether there was any competent evidence before the Commission to support its findings of fact; and (2) whether . . . the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Click v. Pilot Freight Carriers, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  2. Crawley v. Southern Devices, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1976
  3. Dolbow v. Holland Industrial, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983
  4. Mayo v. City of WashingtonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
  5. Crawley v. Southern Devices, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1977

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Johnson v. Jones Group, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1996
  2. Sanders v. Broyhill Furniture IndustriesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1996
  3. Counts v. Black Decker CorporationCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1996
  4. Matthews v. Petroleum Tank Service, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1992
  5. Sanhueza v. Liberty Steel ErectorsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1996

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API