Watkins v. City of Asheville
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
ORR, Judge.
Plaintiff first argues that the Full Commission erred in finding as fact “[t]hat the surgery recommended by plaintiff’s physician has a high probability of significantly reducing the period of plaintiff’s disability and would be sought by a similarly situated reasonable man.” For the reasons set forth below, we find no error. .
In reviewing an opinion and award of the Industrial Commission, this Court is limited in its inquiry to two questions of law: “(1) whether there was any competent evidence before the Commission to support its findings of fact; and (2) whether . . . the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Click v. Pilot Freight Carriers, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
- Crawley v. Southern Devices, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1976
- Dolbow v. Holland Industrial, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983
- Mayo v. City of WashingtonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
- Crawley v. Southern Devices, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
3Cited by29 opinions
- Johnson v. Jones Group, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1996
- Sanders v. Broyhill Furniture IndustriesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1996
- Counts v. Black Decker CorporationCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1996
- Matthews v. Petroleum Tank Service, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1992
- Sanhueza v. Liberty Steel ErectorsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1996
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.