Legal Opinion

Powe v. Centerpoint Human Services

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided September 6, 2011No. COA10-1022PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GEER, Judge.

Both plaintiff and defendants appeal from an opinion and award entered by the Industrial Commission that found plaintiff had failed to “fully comply” with Commission-ordered vocational rehabilitation, but still reinstated disability benefits on the grounds that defendants had ceased offering vocational rehabilitation services to plaintiff. We hold that the Commission failed to apply the correct legal standard in determining whether plaintiff complied with vocational rehabilitation under N.C. Gen. Stat. § 97-25 (2009). We, therefore, remand for the Commission to make findings of…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Seagraves v. Austin Co. of GreensboroCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1996
  2. Weil v. . HerringSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934
  3. McRae v. Toastmaster, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2004
  4. Schofield v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  5. State v. HunterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Powe v. Centerpoint Human ServicesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2013
  2. Ketchie v. Fieldcrest Cannon, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2015
  3. Poole v. University of North CarolinaCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2014
  4. In re: DavisCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2017
  5. Poole v. University of North CarolinaCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2014

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API