Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Carter County v. Oliver-Hill Const. Co.

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided September 15, 1920PublishedCited by 12 opinions

PROM CARTER. Appeal from the Chancery Court of Carter County.— Hon. H. Haynes, Chancellor.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice McKinney

In October, 1915, the Oliver-Hill Construction Company' entered into a written contract with the road commissioners of Carter county for the construction of certain roads and highways in said county., and the Hartford Accident & Indemnity Company became surety on the bond of the construction company, which bond provided, among other things, as follows:

“In addition to guaranteeing the faithful performance of the contract as appears from same hereto attached and hereinbefore set forth, it is also understood and agreed that this bond shall protect all laborers and materialmen who furnish labor…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Illinois Surety Co. v. John Davis Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1917
  2. Brogan v. National Surety Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1918
  3. Title Guaranty & Trust Co. of Scranton v. Crane Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1910
  4. Keokee Consolidated Coke Co. v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  5. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. United States Ex Rel. BartlettSupreme Court of the United States · 1913

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Southern Const. Co. v. HalliburtonTennessee Supreme Court · 1923
  2. U. S. Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Henderson CountyTexas Commission of Appeals · 1925
  3. Cass v. SmithTennessee Supreme Court · 1921
  4. Hansen v. RemerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
  5. Hamblen Motor Co. v. Miller & HarleTennessee Supreme Court · 1924

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API