Legal Opinion

Jones v. Layman

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 14, 1890No. 14,278PublishedCited by 19 opinions

From the Owen Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtBerkshire, J.

The appellee sued the appellant, alleging a marriage contract and its breach. The complaint contains two paragraphs; to each the appellant filed a demurrer, and said demurrers being overruled, he reserved exceptions; he then answered the general denial, and the cause being at issue was submitted to a jury, who returned a verdict for the appellee. After the verdict had been returned, the appellant filed a motion for a new trial, which was overruled by the court and he excepted; thereupon the court rendered judgment for the appellee.

The appellant has assigned five several errors; the third is…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Haymond v. SaucerIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  2. Ohio & Mississippi Railway Co. v. McCartneyIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Brock v. State ex rel. JohnsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  4. King v. KerseyIndiana Supreme Court · 1850
  5. Cates v. McKinneyIndiana Supreme Court · 1874

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Terre Haute & Indianapolis Railroad v. McCorkleIndiana Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Pennsylvania Co. v. SearsIndiana Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Grisell v. Noel Bros. Flour, Feed Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1894
  4. State v. ShepphardMontana Supreme Court · 1899
  5. Smith v. HallSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1897

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API