Legal Opinion

Cates v. McKinney

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1874PublishedCited by 12 opinions

From the Fountain Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtDowney, J.

This was an action by the appellee against the appellant, for breach of marriage contract. The complaint -consisted of three paragraphs, the second of which was withdrawn, and no question is made upon it. The first paragraph is as follows:

“ The plaintiff complains of the defendant, and says that .said defendant entered into a contract with her,-in the month of June, 1867, by which it was agreed by and between them both that they would get married in the month of September following; and she avers that she made all necessary arrangements and preparations to consummate said contract, and was…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Boynton v. KelloggMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1807
  2. Lindley v. DempseyIndiana Supreme Court · 1873
  3. King v. KerseyIndiana Supreme Court · 1850
  4. Paul v. FrazierMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1807
  5. Ungles v. GravesIndiana Supreme Court · 1828

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Gunder v. TibbitsIndiana Supreme Court · 1899
  2. Haymond v. SaucerIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  3. Lanigan v. NeelyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1907
  4. Jones v. LaymanIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
  5. Felger v. EtzellIndiana Supreme Court · 1881

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API