Legal Opinion

West Virginia Pulp & Paper Co. v. Richmond Cedar Works

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 17, 1954No. 26PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtErvin, J.

The answering defendant asserts by his assignments of error that the proceedings hitherto had in this cause are not sufficient to establish the petitioner’s title to the land sought to be registered, or to warrant quieting the petitioner’s alleged title to such land as against his claim. This position is untenable.

When the answering defendant filed his answer, he put the petitioner’s application for registration in contest. Contested proceedings for the registration of land titles under the Torrens Law are triable in the mode prescribed by subdivisions 1, 2, and 3 of G.S. 43-11.

These…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. Mobley v. . GriffinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1889
  2. Campbell v. Everhart.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
  3. Prevatt v. Harrelson.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1903
  4. Moore v. . MillerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1920
  5. Gudger v. . HensleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1880

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Day v. GodwinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
  2. Taylor v. JohnstonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  3. Seawell v. Boone's Mill Fishing Club, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
  4. Campbell v. MayberryCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1971
  5. Gahagan v. GosnellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API