Legal Opinion

Gahagan v. Gosnell

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided April 19, 1967No. 357PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPless, J.

The plaintiff introduced a deed from Bonnie Gaha-gan to him dated August 17, 1964 and recorded in Deed Book 95, page 183, of Madison County Registry. It conveyed a tract of land with a number of calls, one of which was “the Agreement Line” referred to in the statement of facts. After the deed including the description had been read to the plaintiff in the presence of the jury, he said: “I can identify the property that is described in the Deed * * * It is a part of the America Brigman Gahagan land. It is the land described in my complaint. I call that particular tract of land the Bessie Holt…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Mobley v. . GriffinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1889
  2. Prevatt v. Harrelson.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1903
  3. Moore v. . MillerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1920
  4. Singleton v. . RoebuckSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1919
  5. Graybeal v. . DavisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1886

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. BrooksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  2. City of Gastonia v. ParrishSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  3. Overman v. SaundersCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1969
  4. Brandenburg Land Co. v. WhiteCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API