Legal Opinion

Foreman v. L. & N. R. R.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided February 3, 1911PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from Ohio Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

Judge Carroll

Affirming.

A demurrer was- sustained to the petition and amended petition of appellant, in which he attempted to set up a cause of action entitling him to recover damages from the appellee company on account of personal injuries received by him while in its employment as a carpenter. The only question before us is whether or not the petition as amended stated facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action.

It is averred in the petition that while appellant was at work for appellee as a carpenter, and acting in the scope of his employment, and using due care…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Ballard & Ballard Co. v. Lee's Admr.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1909
  2. Pullman Co. v. GellerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1908
  3. Pittsburg, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Ry. Co. v. SchaubCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1910
  4. Runians v. Keller & Brady Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1911
  5. Ross-Paris Co. v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1906

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Wiley v. Cincinnati, New Orleans & Texas Pacific Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1914
  2. Young v. Norfolk & Western Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1916
  3. J. M. Robinson, Norton & Co. v. LegrandeCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1912
  4. Baldridge v. W. M. Ritter Lumber Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1921
  5. Andrews Steel Co. v. MyersCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1915

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API