Pittsburg, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Ry. Co. v. Schaub
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
CASE 79.- SUIT BY JOHN SCHAUB AGAINST THE PITTS-BURG, CINCINNATI, CHICAGO & ST. LOUIS RAIL-. WAY COfitPAff~Y AND ANOTH~R FOR PE~hSONAL INJURY, - Appeal from Jefferson Circuit Court (Common Pleas Branch, Third Division). WALTER P. LINCOLN, Judge. Judgmenit for plaintiff, defendants appeal.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion, op the Court by
Judge Hobson
— Affirming.
The Kentucky Malt & G-rain Company operates a plant at Thirteenth and Maple streets in Louisville, and owns in connection with its plant a railway switch track, connecting with the tracks of the Pitts*655burgv Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Company. This switch track is short, holding only about four cars. John Schaub was an employe of the grain company, and on March 10, 1908, was directed by his foreman to go under a car standing on the switch track with a fellow workman named Linert, to stop a hole which had been discovered in the floor…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Louisville, Cincinnati & Lexington R. R. v. Case's administratorCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1873
- Louisville & Nashville R. R. v. WolfeCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1882
- Louisville & Nashville R. R. v. HurstCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1909
- Kentucky Central R. v. McMurtyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1882
3Cited by10 opinions
- Bearden v. Texas Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1931
- Strong v. Louisville Nashville Railroad Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1931
- Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Benke's AdministratorCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1917
- S. K. Jones Construction Co. v. HendleyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1928
- Helton v. Gunn Coal Mining Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1935
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.