Legal Opinion

Detroit River Transit Co. v. Aldrich

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 9, 1913No. Docket No. 33PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Error to Wayne; Codd, J. Assumpsit by the Detroit River Transit Company against Byron S. Aldrich for gravel sold and delivered to defendant. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtSteere, C. J.

This is an action in assumpsit, in which plaintiff recovered against defendant, in the circuit court of Wayne county, on May 25, 1911, a judgment in the sum of $580.59, being a balance claimed due on a quantity of gravel sold and delivered to defendant. Plaintiff declared on the common counts in assumpsit, serving a bill of particulars, showing amounts, date of delivery, and price of a quantity of gravel furnished defendant, amounting to $5,984.60 and payments credited on same amounting to $5,429.08, leaving a balance in plaintiff’s favor of $555.52. Defendant pleaded the general issue with…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Watkins v. FordMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
  2. Bolt v. FriederickMichigan Supreme Court · 1885
  3. Hamilton v. FrothinghamMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
  4. Delaware & Hudson Canal Co. v. RobertsMichigan Supreme Court · 1888

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. People ex rel. H. Houghton & Sons v. TravesMichigan Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Lyons v. City of Grand RapidsMichigan Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Flynn v. BarryMichigan Supreme Court · 1922
  4. Weny v. GrangerMichigan Supreme Court · 1922

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API