Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Gustafson v. Zolin

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 25, 1997No. C023542PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

DAVIS, Acting P. J.

The Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV) appeals from that portion of a writ of mandate directing it to pay $1,185 in attorney fees to petitioner (Gustafson) under Government Code section 800. The DMV suspended Gustafson’s driver’s license after determining that he had been arrested for driving with a blood-alcohol level of .08 percent or more. (Veh. Code, § 13353.2, subd. (a)(1).) A driver safety officer from the DMV later concluded, in a letter to Gustafson’s attorney, that the suspension could not be lifted upon Gustafson’s submittal of a municipal court minute…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Bowers v. New York & Albany Lighterage Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1927
  2. Bowers, Collector of Internal Revenue v. New York & Albany Lighterage Co. Same v. Seaman. Same v. FullerSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  3. Panopulos v. MaderisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  4. Richmond v. Dart Industries, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1987
  5. Honey Baked Hams, Inc. v. DickensCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Lafayette Bollinger Development v. Town of MoragaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API