Legal Opinion
Neiberger v. Hawkins
District Court, D. Colorado
Decided November 12, 1999No. Civ.A. 99-B-1120PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
BABCOCK, District Judge.
In this action brought by patients of the Forensic Institute at the Colorado Mental Health Institute at Pueblo (the “CMHI-P”), Defendants, Robert Hawkins, Garry Toerber, the Colorado Department of Human Services (the “DHS”), and the CMHI-P (collectively “Defendants”), move to dismiss Plaintiffs’ second amended complaint. Plaintiffs, James Neiberger, Dan-ford Eldridge, Paul Gardner, and Terence Jacobs (collectively “Plaintiffs”), oppose this motion. The issues are adequately briefed and orally argued. For the reasons set forth below, I grant…
2Cases cited44 opinions
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Will v. Michigan Department of State PoliceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Colorado River Water Conservation District v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Craven v. University of Colorado Hospital AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2001
- Neiberger v. HawkinsDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2002
- Neiberger v. HawkinsDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2001
- Watkins v. California Dept. of CorrectionsDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2000
- Robbins v. Bureau of Land ManagementDistrict Court, D. Wyoming · 2003
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.