Legal Opinion

Ryal v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided March 10, 1919No. A-2801PublishedCited by 25 opinions

Appeal from District Court, McIntosh County; R. W. Higgins, Judge. John Ryal was convicted of larceny of live stock, and appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtArmstrong, J.

The plaintiff in error, John Ryal, hereinafter referred to as “defendant,” was, together with Nick Barrow and Sam Guy, jointly informed against for the offense of larceny of live stock. The prosecution was dismissed as to Nick Barrow and Sam Guy, and upon his trial defendant was convicted, and his punishment fixed at six years’ imprisonment in the penitentiary.

To reverse the judgment rendered, the defendant prosecutes this appeal.

The information contains two counts, and the state elected to stand upon the first count, which count, omitting caption and signature, is as follows :

“That John…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. People v. . ShilitanoNew York Court of Appeals · 1916
  2. People v. SuttonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
  3. People v. FreemanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  4. People v. TallmadgeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  5. Musgraves v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1910

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Williams v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1975
  2. State v. KosankeWashington Supreme Court · 1945
  3. Indian Fred v. StateArizona Supreme Court · 1929
  4. Espy v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1939
  5. Shepherd v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1931

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API