Legal Opinion

Musgraves v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided January 25, 1910No. A-68PublishedCited by 30 opinions

Appeal from Johnston County Court;-Nick Wolfe, Judge. S. H. Musgraves was convicted of violating the prohibitory law, and appeals. — Citing: Graham v. State, 50 Ark. 161; Price v. U. 8., 1 Okla. Or. 291; 3 Rice on Evidence, p. 608.

1Opinion of the Court

FURMAN, PRESIDING Judge.

First. The defendant presented the following duly verified motion for a continuance:

“In the Johnston County Court. State of Oklahoma, v. S. II. Musgraves, Defendant. Motion for Continuance. Comes the defendant, and moves the court to continue the trial of this cause until a future term of this court, and for cause says that he cannot safely go to trial on account of the.absence of Claude Cox, who until a very few days ago resided at Ada, Okla., and ¡now resides at Sulphur, Okla., as he is informed and believes that if he were present he would swear that the defendant…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Slater v. United StatesCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1908
  2. Price v. United StatesCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1908

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. State v. Fong LoonIdaho Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Fowler v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1912
  3. Edwards v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1913
  4. Winfield v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1920
  5. Ryal v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1919

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API