Krantz v. City of Hutchinson
Supreme Court of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Hoch, J.:
Plaintiffs owning land- in the vicinity of Hutchinson, Kan., seek to recover from the city for property damage from the overflow of floodwaters alleged to have resulted from the construction of a dike by the city officials. The city demurred to the petition on the ground that it did not state a cause, of action. The demurrer was sustained and this appeal followed.
The Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Company was named as a codefendant, but inasmuch as the city alone is involved in this appeal, the action will be here treated as one against…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Railway Co. v. McCarthySupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Salt Lake City v. HollisterSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Larrabee v. Town of CloverdaleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
- Rose v. City of GypsumSupreme Court of Kansas · 1919
- Wichita Water Co. v. City of WichitaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1916
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Kansas Public Employees Retirement System v. Reimer & Koger Associates, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1997
- Brown v. Wichita State UniversitySupreme Court of Kansas · 1975
- Dougan v. Rossville Drainage DistrictSupreme Court of Kansas · 1988
- Wendler v. City of Great BendSupreme Court of Kansas · 1957
- Executive Aircraft Consulting, Inc. v. City of NewtonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1993
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.