Legal Opinion

Krantz v. City of Hutchinson

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided July 10, 1948No. 37,111PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Hoch, J.:

Plaintiffs owning land- in the vicinity of Hutchinson, Kan., seek to recover from the city for property damage from the overflow of floodwaters alleged to have resulted from the construction of a dike by the city officials. The city demurred to the petition on the ground that it did not state a cause, of action. The demurrer was sustained and this appeal followed.

The Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Company was named as a codefendant, but inasmuch as the city alone is involved in this appeal, the action will be here treated as one against…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Railway Co. v. McCarthySupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. Salt Lake City v. HollisterSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  3. Larrabee v. Town of CloverdaleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
  4. Rose v. City of GypsumSupreme Court of Kansas · 1919
  5. Wichita Water Co. v. City of WichitaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1916

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Kansas Public Employees Retirement System v. Reimer & Koger Associates, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1997
  2. Brown v. Wichita State UniversitySupreme Court of Kansas · 1975
  3. Dougan v. Rossville Drainage DistrictSupreme Court of Kansas · 1988
  4. Wendler v. City of Great BendSupreme Court of Kansas · 1957
  5. Executive Aircraft Consulting, Inc. v. City of NewtonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1993

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API