Legal Opinion
People v. Olds
New York Supreme Court
Decided July 11, 1988PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Phylis Skloot Bamberger, J.
In a pretrial motion the defense seeks to preclude admission of one of the defendant’s statements. The defendant, relying on CPL 710.30 (1) (a) and People v O’Doherty (70 NY2d 479 [1987]), argues that the notice of intent to use the evidence was late and no good cause was shown by the State to excuse the out-of-time filing. The State appears to argue that the good cause requirement does not apply here because timely notice was actually given about another of the defendant’s state*459ments and, therefore, the only issue before this court is whether…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Jackson v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- People v. HuntleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1965
- People v. O'DohertyNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
- People v. GreerNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- People v. HolleyCriminal Court of the City of New York · 1993
- People v. OcasioNew York Supreme Court · 1990
- People v. PenningCriminal Court of the City of New York · 1991
- People v. UtriaCriminal Court of the City of New York · 1995