Legal Opinion

People v. Ocasio

New York Supreme Court

Decided February 20, 1990PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Herbert J. Lipp, J.

At a suppression hearing conducted in this case, the arrest was determined to be legal and the lineup fairly conducted. *689The sole outstanding pretrial issue is whether the People may amend their previously served CPL 710.30 (1) (b) notice by changing the name of the individual set forth in said notice. For the reasons stated herein, the People’s motion to amend the statutory notice is granted.

The defendant was arraigned on May 16, 1989 and charged with robbery in the first degree et al. On that date, the People served notice pursuant to CPL 710.30 (1) (b)…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. People v. GissendannerNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
  3. People v. BerkowitzNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
  4. People v. TasNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
  5. People v. O'DohertyNew York Court of Appeals · 1987

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. People v. OcasioAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
  2. People v. CanuteAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  3. People v. HiltonNew York Supreme Court · 1990
  4. People v. MenaNew York Supreme Court · 1992
  5. People v. SmithNew York Supreme Court · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API