Legal Opinion

People v. Penning

Criminal Court of the City of New York

Decided September 26, 1991PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Lee Cross, J.

Defendant moves to preclude the People from introducing in evidence a written statement which he made, on the grounds that proper notice of it was not given to him pursuant to CPL 710.30 (1) (a). That motion is denied. Defendant also moves to suppress his written and oral statements, arguing that the People have not proven that he knowingly, intelligently and voluntarily waived his constitutional rights prior to making the statements. That motion is denied. Finally - defendant moves to preclude the People from introducing into evidence in-court identifications…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. People v. TasNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
  2. People v. O'DohertyNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
  3. People v. NewballNew York Court of Appeals · 1990
  4. People v. DukesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
  5. People v. RiosAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. People v. HolleyCriminal Court of the City of New York · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API