Bleyer v. Gross
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtWilkie, J.
The only issue on this appeal is whether there was credible evidence to support the jury’s award of $7,500 for future medical expenses on behalf of Mrs. Bleyer.
The rule is well established that a verdict or a finding of a jury will not be set aside or disturbed, “if there is any credible evidence which under any reasonable view fairly admits of an inference that supports the jury’s finding.” Van Galder v. Snyder (1948), 254 Wis. 120, 123, 35 N. W. (2d) 187. “The familiar rule, often declared by this court, that where there is credible evidence to support a finding of a jury we may not disturb…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Powers v. Allstate InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1960
- Unruh v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1959
- Diemel v. WeirichWisconsin Supreme Court · 1953
- Hallum v. Village of OmroWisconsin Supreme Court · 1904
- Dickman v. SchaefferWisconsin Supreme Court · 1960
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Firkus v. RombalskiWisconsin Supreme Court · 1964
- Meracle v. Children's Service Society of WisconsinWisconsin Supreme Court · 1989
- Weeden v. City of BeloitWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
- Shirley Molzof, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Robert E. Molzof v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
- Spleas v. Milwaukee & Suburban Transport Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.