Legal Opinion
In re Sulfuric Acid Antitrust Litigation
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided September 7, 2005No. MDL Docket No. 1536; No. 03 C 4576PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
COLE, United States Magistrate Judge.
INTRODUCTION
During the course of discovery in this mul-ti-district antitrust suit, in which plaintiffs allege that the defendants engaged in a conspiracy to raise, fix, maintain or stabilize the price of sulfuric acid in the United States in violation of Section 1 of the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1, plaintiffs deposed Kevin Cannon, Kim Ross, and Tony DeSanti. The plaintiffs have characterized them as “three of the most key witnesses in this litigation.” I previously rejected plaintiffs’ arguments in support of an additional…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Bowen v. GilliardSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- W. B. Worthen Co. v. KavanaughSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Denise Sanders v. Venture Stores, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
- Zapata Hermanos Sucesores, S.A. v. Hearthside Baking Company, Inc., D/B/A Maurice Lenell Cooky CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Richman v. SheahanDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2006
- In re Sulfuric Acid Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2006
- Finwall v. City of ChicagoDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2006
- In re Sulfuric Acid Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2005
- In re Sulfuric Acid Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2006
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.