In re Sulfuric Acid Antitrust Litigation
District Court, N.D. Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
COLE, United States Magistrate Judge.
As this is the seventh opinion in this case, the background of the litigation need not be revisited.1 The present controversy involves the testimony of plaintiffs’ expert economic witnesses, Drs. James McClave, a statistician, and Robert Tollison, an economist, whom the defendants contend should not be allowed to testify because: 1) Dr. Tollison’s identity and his opinions were not timely disclosed under Rules 26(a)(2)(B) and (C) in accordance with Judge Coar’s scheduling order; 2) the plaintiffs failed to disclose the identity…
2Cases cited67 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- United States v. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Williamson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Brooke Group Ltd. v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- In re Toyota Motor Corp. Unintended Acceleration Marketing, Sales Practices, & Products Liability LitigationDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2013
- Bouygues Telecom, S.A. v. TekelecDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2007
- System Development Integration, LLC v. Computer Sciences Corp.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2012
- Sancom, Inc. v. Qwest Communications Corp.District Court, D. South Dakota · 2010
- Guarantee Trust Life Insurance v. American Medical & Life InsuranceDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2013
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.