Legal Opinion

Jessup v. Carmichael

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided November 15, 1954No. 5-501PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWard, J.

The questions discussed here are: Do the allegations in appellant’s petition filed in the Chancery Court entitle her to relief under Act 274 of 1953, known as the Declaratory Judgment Act, and was it reversible error for the trial court to sustain a demurrer to her petition1?

Eva Jessup, appellant, filed a petition alleging: She is the owner of lot 18 in Gregg & Houghton’s Subdivision of the South Main Addition to the City of Jonesboro and desires to improve and use said property for business purposes; one of the defendants, Carmichael, owns an adjoining lot on the north side on which is…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Spaulding v. MorseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1947
  2. Chicago Furniture Forwarding Co. v. BowlesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1947
  3. Lyman v. LymanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
  4. Adams v. City of AtlanticSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1948
  5. Ball v. CooterTennessee Supreme Court · 1947

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Jegley v. PicadoSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2002
  2. Ragon v. Great American Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1954
  3. City of Fort Smith v. Didicom Towers, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2005
  4. Cairns v. WittSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1967
  5. Jegley v. PicadoSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2002

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API