Legal Opinion · Dissent

Jegley v. Picado

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided July 5, 2002No. 01-815Published

1DissentRay Thornton, Justice

In my view, the majority has issued an advisory opinion declaring unconstitutional a law passed by the legislature and signed into law by the governor. I respectfully dissent on the grounds that there was no justiciable case before us for decision, and because I believe we should heed the principles articulated by Justice Felix Frankfurter, writing for the United States Supreme Court, in Poe v. Ullman, 367 U.S. 497 (1961). Justice Frankfurter cautioned courts that they should use their powers to overturn legislative acts only when a case is properly before the court, when he wrote:

Whenever,…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Poe v. UllmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  2. Chicago & Grand Trunk Railway Co. v. WellmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  3. Andres v. First Ark. Development Finance Corp.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1959
  4. Carter v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1973
  5. Doe v. BryanNevada Supreme Court · 1986

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API