Legal Opinion

City of Fort Smith v. Didicom Towers, Inc.

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided June 2, 2005No. 04-678PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Donald L. Corbin, Justice.

This case involves a dispute over the placement of additional platform antennae on a cellular telecommunications tower. Appellant City of Fort Smith sought a declaratory judgment from the Sebastian County Circuit Court that additional platform antennae on a tower owned by Appellee Didicom Towers, Inc., constituted an intensification of a nonconforming use, under the City’s zoning code. The trial court dismissed the suit on the ground that an action brought by Didicom in federal court would determine the issues between the parties. The City contends that this ruling…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Jegley v. PicadoSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2002
  2. Barnes v. EverettSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2003
  3. Middleton v. LockhartSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2001
  4. Jurisdictionusa, Inc. v. loislaw.com, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2004
  5. Bell v. BershearsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2002

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Baptist Health v. MurphySupreme Court of Arkansas · 2010
  2. Thomas v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2007
  3. Cox v. MillerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2005
  4. Hunter v. RunyanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2011
  5. Callaway v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2007

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API