Legal Opinion

Ohio Ex Rel. Clarke v. Deckebach

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided May 16, 1927No. 272PublishedCited by 106 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Stone

An ordinance, No. 76-1918, of the City of Cincinnati, requires the licensing of pool and billiard rooms, and prohibits the issue of licenses to aliens. Plaintiff in error petitioned the Supreme Court of Ohio for a writ of mandamus commanding defendant in error, the auditor of Cincinnati, to-grant him a license to conduct a billiard and pool room in that city. The petition alleged that plaintiff was a subject of the King of England and that he had been refused a license solely because he was not a citizen. It drew in question the validity of the ordinance as violating Art. I of the treaty…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Yick Wo v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  2. Truax v. RaichSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  3. Terrace v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  4. Patsone v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  5. McCready v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1877

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by106 opinions

  1. Hines v. DavidowitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. Nebbia v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  3. Graham v. RichardsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. American Communications Assn. v. DoudsSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
  5. Hirabayashi v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943

101 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API