Legal Opinion

Vibber v. United States Rubber Company

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided June 15, 1966No. 66 Civ. 34PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FRANKEL, District Judge.

Plaintiff, a New York resident, holds Patent No. 3,192,698, issued on July 6, 1965, covering improvements in “Twisting Spindle Balloon Controls.” His complaint charges that defendant has been and is infringing the patent “by making, causing to be made, selling and causing to be sold and using or causing to be used, within the District and elsewhere * *, Controls made in accordance with and embodying the invention * * Defendant has moved under Rule 12(b), Fed.R.Civ.P., and 28 U.S.C. § 1406(a) to dismiss for improper venue, or, alternatively, to transfer the action to…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Fourco Glass Co. v. Transmirra Products Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Jerome v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  3. Stonite Products Co. v. Melvin Lloyd Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
  4. Pure Oil Co. v. SuarezSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  5. MacGregor v. Westinghouse Electric & Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Technograph Printed Circuits, Ltd. v. Packard Bell Electronics Corp.District Court, C.D. California · 1968
  2. Xerox Corporation v. Litton Industries, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1973
  3. Funnelcap, Inc. v. Orion Industries, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1975
  4. AMP INCORPORATED v. Burndy of Midwest, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1971
  5. Burlington Industries, Inc. v. Exxon CorporationDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API