Burlington Industries, Inc. v. Exxon Corporation
District Court, D. Maryland
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
JAMES R. MILLER, Jr., District Judge.
Plaintiff has moved, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 21 to add Amtech Corporation, a Delaware corporation having a place of business at Odenton, Maryland, as a defendant in the present action.
According to the plaintiff, this suit was initially instituted when it had no knowledge of Amtech Corporation or of its acts of alleged infringement of plaintiff’s patent. Plaintiff claims that only during the deposition of Sidney Levin, Vice President of Amtech, did the facts upon which plaintiff now depends become clear. Plaintiff’s memorandum…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Aro Manufacturing Co. v. Convertible Top Replacement Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Schnell v. Peter Eckrich & Sons, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Fromberg, Inc. v. Jack W. ThornhillCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1963
- Engineered Sports Products v. Brunswick Corp.District Court, D. Utah · 1973
- American Cyanamid Company v. Nopco Chemical Company and Quality Feeds, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1968
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Rohm and Haas Co. v. Dawson Chemical Co., Inc.District Court, S.D. Texas · 1983
- Foundation for Blood Research v. St. Paul Marine & Fire InsuranceSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1999
- Sims v. MacK Trucks, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1978
- Ingersoll-Rand Co. v. Rockwell International Corp.District Court, S.D. Florida · 1976
- Warner-Lambert Co. v. CB Fleet Co., Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1984
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.