Legal Opinion
Robinson v. Cahill
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided March 30, 1972PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
119 N.J. Super. 40 (1972)
289 A.2d 569
KENNETH ROBINSON, ETC., ET AL, PLAINTIFFS,
v.
WILLIAM T. CAHILL, ETC., ET AL, DEFENDANTS.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division.
Decided March 30, 1972.
Mr. Harold J. Ruvoldt, Jr., for plaintiffs (Messrs. Ruvoldt and Ruvoldt, attorneys).
Mr. Stephen G. Weiss, special counsel, for defendants (Mr. George F. Kugler, Jr., Attorney General of New Jersey, attorney).
BOTTER, J.S.C.
Following the filing of my opinion in this case on January 19, 1972, and reported in 118 N.J. Super. 223, counsel for defendants asked leave to be heard on the form of judgment to be…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Washington National Insurance v. Board of Review of New Jersey Unemployment Compensation CommissionSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1949
- Robson v. RodriquezSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1958
- Adler's Quality Bakery, Inc. v. Gaseteria, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1960
- Reingold v. HarperSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1951
- Robinson v. CahillNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1972
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Johnson v. SchraderWyoming Supreme Court · 1973
- Young v. ByrneNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1976
- Planned Parenthood of New York City v. StateSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1977
- Blair v. Erie Lackawanna Railway Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1973
- Robinson v. CahillSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1976
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.